With job market conditions
rapidly catching up with pre-recession levels of demand, we’ve seen a steady
increase in the number of counter offers being used as a means to try to retain
staff who’ve secured an offer elsewhere and tendered their notice.
As demand for staff rises,
availability drops, and with employers focused on making the most of the
economic recovery, retaining experienced staff is high on the agenda.
Good news for employees, not
so good news for recruiters who, having invested a significant amount of time managing
the process to this stage, can then experience last minute drop-outs from
jobseekers who are persuaded to stay. A quick search online will throw up
dozens of blogs and articles about counter offers, usually written by
recruiters, quoting unsubstantiated statistics on the number of people who end
up leaving their employer six to nine months after accepting an offer (usually
between 80-95% - take your pick or, better still, read Mitch Sullivan's investigative blog on this subject). The overriding message being: don’t do it,
take MY job!
There may well be a high
proportion of individuals in this situation who do ultimately decide to move on
after promises have been broken further down the line, but even so, unless there
is a history from the individuals’ specific employer/line manager, I’m not sure
this is relevant enough information to be basing important career decisions on.
For me, when a jobseeker
decides to accept a counter offer, what this really tells me is that:
a) the
other opportunity wasn’t good enough in the first place, or
b) the candidate
never really wanted to leave their employer, they just wanted better reward and
commitment from them. Maybe they’ve discussed this with their manager and it’s fallen on deaf ears, or maybe they just feel this is the best way
to force their hand?
I do however believe there is
some truth in the often-stated claim that going through a counter offer process
breaks a level of trust with an employer, especially if the employee had not
raised any dissatisfaction previously. I also believe financial boosts alone
are short term solutions that will often reoccur when the employees next salary
review takes in to account the unplanned increase that’s already taken place.
From the employers
perspective it’s also far from ideal. How will this affect the employees trust
and buy-in to the business when it’s had to get to this stage? You can be sure
at least one of their close colleagues will be aware of the situation and may
now decide to go through a similar process themselves to increase their
financial position.
No comments:
Post a Comment